GOPHERSPACE.DE - P H O X Y
gophering on 1436.ninja
    #[1]alternate

   [2]News for nerds, stuff that matters [3]Search Slashdot [4]Slashdot
   RSS

[5]Slashdot

     * [6]Stories
     *
          + Firehose
          + [7]All
          + [8]Popular
     * [9]Polls
     * [10]Software
     * [11]Apparel
     * [12]Newsletter
     * [13]Jobs

   [14]Submit

   Search Slashdot
   ____________________
   (BUTTON)
     * [15]Login
     * or
     * [16]Sign up

     * Topics:
     * [17]Devices
     * [18]Build
     * [19]Entertainment
     * [20]Technology
     * [21]Open Source
     * [22]Science
     * [23]YRO

     * Follow us:
     * [24]RSS
     * [25]Facebook
     * [26]LinkedIn
     * [27]Twitter
     * [28]Youtube
     * [29]Mastodon
     * [30]Newsletter

   Become a fan of Slashdot on [31]Facebook


   Nickname: ____________________

   Password: ____________________
   [ ] Public Terminal
     __________________________________________________________________

   Log In [32]Forgot your password?

   [33]Close

   binspamdupenotthebestofftopicslownewsdaystalestupid

   freshfunnyinsightfulinterestingmaybe

   offtopicflamebaittrollredundantoverrated

   insightfulinterestinginformativefunnyunderrated

   descriptive

   typodupeerror

   Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically
   [34]sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with
   [35]this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your
   project in front of SourceForge's nearly 30 million monthly users. It
   takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project
   releases today!
   [36]Sign up for the Slashdot newsletter! or [37]check out the new
   Slashdot job board to browse remote jobs or jobs in your area
   [38]×

   171109394 story

   [39]Privacy [40]United States

[41]TSA Expands Controversial Facial Recognition Program [42](cbsnews.com)
[43]55

   Posted by [44]BeauHD on Wednesday June 07, 2023 @06:00AM from the
   smile-you're-on-camera dept.
   [45]SonicSpike shares a report from CBS News: As possible
   record-setting crowds fill airports nationwide, passengers may
   encounter new technology at the security line. At 25 airports in the
   U.S. and Puerto Rico, the TSA is [46]expanding a controversial digital
   identification program that uses facial recognition. This comes as the
   TSA and other divisions of Homeland Security are under pressure from
   lawmakers to update technology and cybersecurity. "We view this as
   better for security, much more efficient, because the image capture is
   fast and you'll save several seconds, if not a minute," said TSA
   Administrator David Pekoske.
   At the world's busiest airport in Atlanta, the TSA checkpoint uses a
   facial recognition camera system to compare a flyer's face to the
   picture on their ID in seconds. If there's not a match, the TSA officer
   is alerted for further review. "Facial recognition, first and foremost,
   is much, much more accurate," Pekoske said. "And we've tested this
   extensively. So we know that it brings the accuracy level close to 100%
   from mid-80% with just a human looking at a facial match." The program
   has been rolled out to more than two dozen airports nationwide since
   2020 and the TSA plans to add the technology, which is currently
   voluntary for flyers, to at least three more airports by the end of the
   year. There are skeptics. Five U.S. senators sent a letter demanding
   that TSA halt the program.

   apply tags__________

[47]←

You may like to read:

[48]→

   [49]Satellite Beams Solar Power Down To Earth, In First-of-a-Kind
   Demonstration

[50]Truck Thief Gunned Down by Owner After AirTag Gives Away Location

[51]Symbolic Wyoming Proposal Urges Voluntary Phase-out of EV Purchases by
2035

[52]Texts and Web Searches Have Been Used to Prosecute Women for Abortions

[53]What Happened After Matt Taibbi Revealed Twitter's Deliberations on
Hunter Biden Tweets?

[54]The Three Reasons Why Elon Musk Called Off His Acquisition of Twitter

[55]Submission: TSA expands controversial facial recognition program

   [56]Dell In Hot Water For Making Shoppers Think Overpriced Monitors
   Were Discounted

[57]TSA Expands Controversial Facial Recognition Program [58]More | [59]Reply
[60]Login

[61]TSA Expands Controversial Facial Recognition Program

   [62]Post [63]Load All Comments
    Full  Abbreviated  Hidden
   /Sea
   Score:
   5
   4
   3
   2
   1
   0
   -1
   [64]More | [65]Reply [66]Login


   Nickname: ____________________

   Password: ____________________
   [ ] Public Terminal
     __________________________________________________________________

   Log In [67]Forgot your password?

   [68]Close
   [69]Close
   [70]Search 55 Comments [71]Log In/Create an Account

   Comments Filter:
     * [72]All
     * [73]Insightful
     * [74]Informative
     * [75]Interesting
     * [76]Funny

   The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted
   them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
     *

[77]Republicans want to reduce spending ([78]Score:5, Insightful)
       by [79]quonset [80]( 4839537 ) writes: on Wednesday June 07, 2023
       @06:25AM ([81]#63582784)
       Here you go. A perfect example of where billions can be cut. An
       unnecessary, bloated government program which serves no useful
       purpose. Even their own inspectors admit the TSA misses up to 95%
       of all fake bombs and explosives used in test scenarios.
       Last I heard, a 95% failure rate is just that. A failure.
       [82]Reply to This [83]Share
       [84]twitter [85]facebook [86]Share on Google+
       [87]Flag as Inappropriate
          +
          +

[88]Re: ([89]Score:1)
            by [90]christoban [91]( 3028573 ) writes:
            From the story:
            " 'So we know that it brings the accuracy level close to 100%
            from mid-80% with just a human looking at a facial match.' "
            So we can much better find an ID mismatch. But that does not
            help with the psychological part of screening: looking for
            fidgety, unusual acting people, asking questions, which has
            proved very effective at finding drug traffickers.
               o
               o

[92]Re: ([93]Score:3)
                 by [94]Entrope [95]( 68843 ) writes:
                 This kind of system always has two types of errors: type
                 I (false positive, in this case accepting a wrong face as
                 belonging to the identity) and type II (false negative,
                 in this case rejecting the real person's face as a
                 match). Most of the easy ways to reduce the rate of
                 either error type increase the other. Giving only one
                 error rate hides the important differences between these
                 two kinds of errors and how that trade-off is being
                 handled.
                    #
                    #
                         @
                         @

[96]Re: ([97]Score:2)
                           by [98]groobly [99]( 6155920 ) writes:
                           People making this statement are idiots with no
                           science background. Just another symptom of
                           kakistocracy.
                              -
                    #

[100]Re: ([101]Score:1)
                      by [102]christoban [103]( 3028573 ) writes:
                      I see. Well, perhaps they're using AI and it's real.
                         @
                    # [104]1 reply beneath your current threshold.
               o

[105]How does this not help? ([106]Score:1)
                 by [107]SuperKendall [108]( 25149 ) writes:
                 So we can much better find an ID mismatch. But that does
                 not help with the psychological part of screening:
                 looking for fidgety, unusual acting people,
                 Why not? It seems like in fact AI would be much better at
                 this, because it can monitor every person every second
                 they are in the airport.
                 asking questions
                 Let's say for a second it can't do that even though
                 eventually it will, all that has to happen is the AI
                 calls out a person for review by an agent using the same
                 flagging as if the ID did not match, then the
                    #
          +

[109]Re: ([110]Score:2)
            by [111]gtall [112]( 79522 ) writes:
            The TSA is using facial recognition on bombs and explosives?
            Those bastards!!
               o
          +

[113]Re: ([114]Score:2, Insightful)
            by [115]Inglix the Mad [116]( 576601 ) writes:
            The same Republicans who (performatively) complain about
            surveillance and yet magically vote for surveillance every
            single time? To be fair they only want the plebes under
            surveillance. They also have their status as legislators to
            get them by security.
            Ron "I love surveillance if it's targeting plebes" Johnson,
            and many other Republicans, will gladly scream "SOFFF ON
            TERRIR!!!" at opponents who want to reign in government
            surveillance and security theater. After all they know 99% of
            their base, despite b
               o
               o

[117]Re: ([118]Score:1)
                 by [119]christoban [120]( 3028573 ) writes:
                 You have been watching too much MSNBC. "Damn
                 Republicans!" is not the answer to every question. Most.
                 Not all.
                    #
                    #

[121]Re: ([122]Score:2)
                      by [123]Inglix the Mad [124]( 576601 ) writes:
                      Sorry mate, but if you left the right-wing echo
                      chamber you'd realize that (as much as they rail
                      against it) Republicans STILL support the
                      surveillance state and call others SOFFF ON
                      TERRIR!!!! to scare their pants wetting base to win
                      elections. Just look at the "border crisis" and
                      pretty much everything else they bleat about as they
                      scream "TERRISTS EVERIWERE!!! FEAR FEAR FEAR!!!"
                      nonstop.
                      Also note I didn't absolve the democratic party at
                      all. I'll give a pass to Russ Feingold, because he
                      called it BS,
                         @
               o

[125]Re: ([126]Score:3)
                 by [127]DarkOx [128]( 621550 ) writes:
                 What is the controversy here?
                 I can't recall a time where it was permissible to board a
                 commercial airliner anonymously. Not sure when the FAA
                 started insisting on passenger manifests but its not
                 exactly new and there are good reasons for it.
                 Look I am all for people being about to move about
                 domestically freely. I absolutely think you should be
                 able to buy a bus or train ticket for cash and if you ID
                 is checked or isn't should be up to the transport company
                 but.. we know the risks where it comes to weaponizi
                    #
                    #

[129]Re: ([130]Score:3)
                      by [131]cellocgw [132]( 617879 ) writes:
                      I can't recall a time where it was permissible to
                      board a commercial airliner anonymously. Not sure
                      when the FAA started insisting on passenger
                      manifests but its not exactly new and there are good
                      reasons for it.
                      You are clearly a youngster. Yes, even in the 60s
                      and 70s airline tickets had names on them, but there
                      was no ID check of any kind. In fact, the director
                      of the SkunkWorks (per the book he wrote) bought
                      tickets to Europe under the name "Ben Dover" to
                      avoid public knowledge of his travel.
                      The original intent, and only justification for,
                      passenger manifests was to be able to alert family
                      members in case of a crash.
                         @
                         @

[133]Re: ([134]Score:2)
                           by [135]DarkOx [136]( 621550 ) writes:
                           True I was to young in the 70s to be buying my
                           own plane tickets -or- really anything.
                           Either way I certainly can't recall a time in
                           the 90s where you were getting on a plane with
                           out some ID checking going on; at least not
                           unless you were a child. Certainly after Pan Am
                           103, if not before things started to tighten up
                           quite a bit.
                           I simply come back to - if we are going to do
                           security it should be better than theater. If
                           we *need* the security or not is a separate
                           conversation. If the requirement that was set
                              -
                    #
                         @
                    # [137]1 reply beneath your current threshold.
               o

[138]Re: ([139]Score:2)
                 by [140]ArchieBunker [141]( 132337 ) writes:
                 The only person who has consistently voted against the
                 patriot act has been Bernie Sanders. Maybe Rand Paul as
                 well but he votes just to look like a contrary asshole.
                    #
                    #

[142]Re: ([143]Score:2)
                      by [144]JackieBrown [145]( 987087 ) writes:
                      Rand Paul is one of the few politicians that voted
                      consistent with his beliefs (and seems to actually
                      have beliefs.)
                      They are different then your beliefs but he's not
                      doing it to be a contrary asshole.
                      I don't agree with Bernie Sanders on much, but do
                      recognize that he is pretty consistent with his
                      values.
                      They both vote on what they think is right versus
                      what their party tells them is right.
                         @
               o

[146]Re: ([147]Score:3)
                 by [148]SomePoorSchmuck [149]( 183775 ) writes:
                 The same Republicans who (performatively) complain about
                 surveillance and yet magically vote for surveillance
                 every single time? To be fair they only want the plebes
                 under surveillance. They also have their status as
                 legislators to get them by security.
                 Ron "I love surveillance if it's targeting plebes"
                 Johnson, and many other Republicans, will gladly scream
                 "SOFFF ON TERRIR!!!" at opponents who want to reign in
                 government surveillance and security theater. After all
                 they know 99% of their base, despite being such rough and
                 tumble individualists, is a bunch of bed wetters living
                 in terminal fear of the world. Add in a bunch of people
                 who have no idea of how pointless such theater is today,
                 but think it's probably a good idea from what Fox has
                 said.
                 So for Republican politicians it's a non-issue.
                 Your neurotransmitter hit from binaristic thinking limits
                 your ability to improve the situation.
                 A huge portion of the Republican and conservatives base
                 hates the TSA and would love to see the agency
                 eliminated. Instead of just seeing another opportunity to
                 rail against people in an Us/Them binary, look for
                 opportunities to make common cause in areas you do
                 overlap with others. Overlaps do exist, but entrenched
                 social/commercial/financial systems are working hard to
                 keep us focused on Othering people. Divide
                    #
                    #

[150]Re: ([151]Score:2)
                      by [152]whoever57 [153]( 658626 ) writes:
                      A huge portion of the Republican and conservatives
                      base hates the TSA and would love to see the agency
                      eliminated
                      Where is the evidence for this? Was this part of the
                      negotiations of the debt limit?
                      I suspect that many, if not most GOP voters are in
                      denial about what "their" party actually supports.
                         @
          +

[154]So where are Democrats pressing for this? ([155]Score:1)
            by [156]SuperKendall [157]( 25149 ) writes:
            You are trying to make this some Republican issue - so you are
            claiming they are the ones stopping the TSA from being
            removed...
            But where is more than one or two Democrats calling for the
            removal of the TSA? The president could do it, yet here we
            have face scanners going in under his watch.
            Why are you making this a partisan issue when plainly all of
            the government class badly wants a massive security state
            apparatus spying on you.
            Wake up and smell the Libertarianism man.
               o
          +

[158]you'll save several seconds ([159]Score:1)
            by [160]0xG [161]( 712423 ) writes:
            you'll save several seconds, if not a minute,
            Oh great, now i will not miss my flights /s
               o
     *
          +
          +

[162]Re:Use facial recognition on the entire airport ([163]Score:5,
Insightful)
            by [164]Joce640k [165]( 829181 ) writes: on Wednesday June 07,
            2023 @09:08AM ([166]#63583048) [167]Homepage
            It's almost as if you believe airports are full of terrorists,
            and that aircraft are the only place they can possibly get
            you.
            Fact 1: Terrorists can do their thing outside of airports ...
            or even in the lines of people waiting to pass through airport
            security. What do you think the effect of a dozen simultaneous
            nail bombs in airport security lines across the country would
            be?
            Fact 2: The only thing the TSA has really done to improve
            security is to lock the cockpit doors on the aircraft.
            Ref: [168]https://www.google.com/search?... [google.com]
            Conclusion: There simply aren't many terrorists in the world.
            [169]Reply to This [170]Parent [171]Share
            [172]twitter [173]facebook [174]Share on Google+
            [175]Flag as Inappropriate
               o
               o
                    #
               o

[176]Re: ([177]Score:2)
                 by [178]JackieBrown [179]( 987087 ) writes:
                 I always wonder why terrorist don't target the waiting
                 lines at airports. That would probably do more impact
                 then a plane now that the cockpits are locked.
                 My takeaway is this isn't a real problem and was a
                 diversionary reaction to 9/11 to take away attention on
                 the failures from both Bush and Clinton to stop this plot
                 before it hit the airports.
                    #
               o [180]1 reply beneath your current threshold.
     *

[181]When you go online to find error rates ([182]Score:2)
       by [183]Required Snark [184]( 1702878 ) writes:
       The results you get all are published by companies that sell the
       technology, or articles about how the TSA is doing a great job
       rolling this out. There are just a few pesky elected officials who
       are standing in the way of PROGRESS by making dumb objections.
       And of course the TSA is would never lie and they are well known
       for their transparency and willingness to admit mistakes. It will
       all deploy seamlessly and no one will ever get stranded in an
       airport and have their trip turned into a Kafkaesque nightmar
          +
     *

[185]I seriously doubt it ([186]Score:3)
       by [187]usedtobestine [188]( 7476084 ) writes: on Wednesday June
       07, 2023 @07:02AM ([189]#63582816)
       Google and Apple's photo apps still can't tell the difference
       between gorillas and blacks:
       [190]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/0... [nytimes.com]
       [191]https://www.wired.com/story/wh... [wired.com]
       If the TSA can, I'm sure both of these billion dollar companies
       would pay quite a lot to license the technology, and pay even more
       for an exclusive license.
       [192]Reply to This [193]Share
       [194]twitter [195]facebook [196]Share on Google+
       [197]Flag as Inappropriate
          +
          +

[198]Re: ([199]Score:2)
            by [200]drinkypoo [201]( 153816 ) writes:
            That's no doubt a real problem in some contexts, but how many
            gorillas have you seen going through the TSA line?
               o
               o
                    #
               o [202]1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          +

[203]Re: ([204]Score:1)
            by [205]christoban [206]( 3028573 ) writes:
            Google and Apple's photo apps still can't tell the difference
            between gorillas and blacks:
            What about gorilla faces? LOL
               o
     *

[207]Controversial for Americans ([208]Score:2)
       by [209]Unpopular Opinions [210]( 6836218 ) writes:
       This looks and feels the same system being used to allow
       non-American citizens to enter the country, found at multiple
       international ports of entry, since many years ago. Surprised the
       volume of people coming in every day from all over the world did
       not adequately trained the American version of the system enough
       for what apparently seems to be an issue with a very ugly face.
          +
     *

[211]TSA Expands Controversial Facial Recognition Progr ([212]Score:1)
       by [213]dawidkaczmarczyk [214]( 10422034 ) writes:
       Wow, airports are implementing facial recognition technology for
       security checks. TSA claims it's faster and more accurate than
       humans, but some senators are skeptical and want it halted. Privacy
       concerns, anyone?
          +
     *

[215]Sounds great, but... ([216]Score:5, Funny)
       by [217]CrappySnackPlane [218]( 7852536 ) writes: on Wednesday June
       07, 2023 @08:09AM ([219]#63582924)
       Sounds great. TSA agent points the gadget at my ID and pushes a
       button, points the gadget at me and pushes another button, either
       it goes "baBEEP" and I get right through, or it goes "BEEPBEEPBEEP"
       and the TSA agent squints at me and my ID like a bouncer carding me
       at a club show, then, presuming the two are a match, waves me
       through.
       ...but I get the feeling it's not going to work out that way. It's
       probably going to be something more like:
       TSA agent points the gadget at my ID and pushes a button. Resulting
       photo is stored forever on a database. TSA points the gadget at me.
       Pushes the wrong button, cancelling the whole operation and
       clearing the picture of my ID from the gadget's memory. TSA agent
       looks confused, then points the gadget at me again and pushes the
       right button. Resulting photo is stored forever on a database.
       Except there's no picture of my ID in the gadget's memory so
       everything just sort of hangs. It takes ten minutes for the TSA
       agent to find a supervisor who can reset the unit. Supervisor
       resets the unit, points the gadget at my ID and pushes a button,
       then, clearly in a hurry, waves the gadget up in the general
       direction of my face and pushes another button, capturing a blurry
       photo of the right side of my face and the wall behind me. It goes
       BEEPBEEPBEEP because the supervisor took a shitty picture, but even
       if it had been pointed in the right direction it would have gone
       off, because the individual hairs on my head and blemishes on my
       face are not a 1:1 match with the picture the DMV took of me in
       mid-sneeze five years ago. The TSA agent grabs me and I am led to a
       small unfurnished office to wait for two hours while they decide
       whether I look like my ID or not. No matter how they decide, they
       end up spending two more hours interrogating me about the middle
       names of various distant relatives I've never even heard of, let
       alone met. After they're finished interrogating me, no matter how
       it goes, they stick their fingers up my butt. This whole time my
       baggage has been subject to "enhanced search procedures", which
       basically means to break everything with a hammer before putting it
       in the cargo hold of a random plane and telling me it's been lost.
       By the time I find myself back home - tired, sore, and bereft of
       baggage; the TSA database has been hacked and the picture of my ID
       has been used in no less than three separate crimes. Wearily, I
       drag myself out to go use a neighbor's phone, since mine is now a
       very fine powder coating the floor of TSA's baggage search area. As
       soon as I leave my front door I'm teargassed by a SWAT team because
       the blurry photo the TSA agent's supervisor took of my right cheek
       and the wall happened to pop a match in the Extremely Dangerous and
       Incredibly Armed Fugitive Terrorist Super Bad Guy database.
       Because we all must be vigilant against TERRISM.
       [220]Reply to This [221]Share
       [222]twitter [223]facebook [224]Share on Google+
       [225]Flag as Inappropriate
          +
          +
               o
          +

[226]Re: ([227]Score:2)
            by [228]NoWayNoShapeNoForm [229]( 7060585 ) writes:
            You missed the part about the floor opening up and swallowing
            you in a bottomless pit of raging fire when the TSA dork
            screws up the process.
               o
          + [230]1 reply beneath your current threshold.
     *

[231]The TSA is not needed ([232]Score:5, Informative)
       by [233]Inglix the Mad [234]( 576601 ) writes: on Wednesday June
       07, 2023 @08:28AM ([235]#63582954)
       Everyone forgets that, for a couple DECADES, people were told to do
       the following during a hijacking:
       Sit down.
       Shut up.
       Listen to the cabin crew / pilots.
       Odds are you'll live through the ordeal.
       That's exactly what Al Qaeda was counting on when they conducted
       their attack. People seem to forget that they did it all on ONE
       DAY. No attack since then has followed a similar profile. Do you
       know why?
       Allow me to say this for the cheap seats of Republican bed wetters
       and other people living in fear of this, or anything similar,
       happening again:
       NOBODY EXCEPT FOR SMALL CHILDREN OR THE EXTREMELY ELDERLY WILL EVER
       SIT STILL DURING A HIJACKING OR OTHER AIR ATTACK.
       REPEAT: NOBODY WILL SIT STILL AGAIN... EVER... NO MATTER HOW YOU
       THREATEN THEM THEY WILL TRY TO KILL TERRORISTS.
       That's right. Look at the resultant actions of passengers towards
       terrorists since then... most should consider themselves lucky to
       be breathing afterwards. You could take away the TSA today, and
       nothing would happen. Why? The old rules are gone, and the
       terrorists know it. There will never be another successful
       hijacking of a passenger plane ever again. No, not ever. Passengers
       will kill the terrorists or die trying. You can't put enough
       terrorists on a plane to hold it long enough for an attack, or
       anything else for that matter. The passengers are more numerous,
       and will die trying to overpower the terrorists. Why shouldn't they
       try to kill the terrorists? They're dead if the terrorists win, but
       they might live if they take the terrorists down.
       Let's ditch the security theater and have a nice day.
       [236]Reply to This [237]Share
       [238]twitter [239]facebook [240]Share on Google+
       [241]Flag as Inappropriate
          +
          +

[242]Re: The TSA is not needed ([243]Score:2)
            by [244]RegistrationIsDumb83 [245]( 6517138 ) writes:
            Heck, these days passengers won't sit still even if everything
            is fine. Random assaults, fights, and even opening the doors
            during landing.
               o
          +

[246]Re: ([247]Score:2)
            by [248]Joce640k [249]( 829181 ) writes:
            We also locked the cockpit door and will refuse to open it.
               o
               o

[250]Re: ([251]Score:2)
                 by [252]Inglix the Mad [253]( 576601 ) writes:
                 They didn't need to lock it at all, that's just more
                 theater. Today you'd be lucky to if the cabin crew /
                 passengers didn't kill you for trying open the door
                 without permission.
                    #
          +

[254]Here's the data that challenges your claim ([255]Score:2, Interesting)
            by [256]Bruce66423 [257]( 1678196 ) writes:
            Enjoy!
            [258]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
               o
     *

[259]The airlines should be responsible for security. ([260]Score:2,
Insightful)
       by [261]PJ6 [262]( 1151747 ) writes:
       Conservatives always claim government can't do anything right, you
       have to starve the beast and all that - so why did nobody object
       when they formed a new bloated federal agency, the TSA? Why should
       our tax money pay for an airline's operating expense?
       If airport security were the responsibility of the airlines
       themselves, lawsuits, or the threat of them, would balance things
       out a little more. But no. We have this instead, misbehavior
       shielded by a sovereign immunity legal black hole that nobody can
       do an
          +
          +

[263]Re: ([264]Score:2)
            by [265]ArchieBunker [266]( 132337 ) writes:
            Conservatives always claim government can't do anything right,
            you have to starve the beast and all that - so why did nobody
            object when they formed a new bloated federal agency, the TSA?
            Why should our tax money pay for an airline's operating
            expense?
            So they could staff it with cronies and hire people as
            political favors. Not to mention all the sweet contracts for
            equipment that their buddies can non compete bid on. Scanners,
            metal detectors, uniforms, you name it.
               o
          +

[267]Re: ([268]Score:2)
            by [269]JackieBrown [270]( 987087 ) writes:
            I think most conservatives would prefer the TSA went away.
               o
          +

[271]Re: ([272]Score:2)
            by [273]avandesande [274]( 143899 ) writes:
            Because we don't have any conservatives in the government,
            just different flavors of neocons and neoliberals. Bush was
            one of the worst of these in my lifetime.
               o
     *

[275]Probably works as well as the lint roller ([276]Score:2)
       by [277]schwit1 [278]( 797399 ) writes:
       [279]https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
          +
     *
          +
          +

[280]Re: ([281]Score:2)
            by [282]Joce640k [283]( 829181 ) writes:
            ....there's no such thing as privacy in public. Simple as
            that. Walking through an airport is a public space.
            That's not the point. The point is that they shouldn't have
            the facial database in the first place.
            (...where did they even get it from?)
               o
               o
                    #
                    #

[284]Re: ([285]Score:2)
                      by [286]Joce640k [287]( 829181 ) writes:
                      You sidestepped the real question - should the TSA
                      have that database?
                         @
               o [288]1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          +
               o
          + [289]1 reply beneath your current threshold.
     *

[290]SOP for Federal TLAs, usual SNAFU ([291]Score:2)
       by [292]SomePoorSchmuck [293]( 183775 ) writes:
       "We view this as better for security, much more efficient, because
       the image capture is fast and you'll save several seconds, if not a
       minute," said TSA Administrator David Pekoske.
       THIS JUST IN-- federal bureaucratic agency expands its bureaucracy
       and control/surveillance/gatekeeping powers in order to solve the
       inefficiencies caused by the federal bureaucratic agency's previous
       expansion of control/surveillance/gatekeeping powers. We can all
       feel relieved that the problem is now solved and there will not
       simply be justification of another expansion 5 years and 5 trillion
       dollars from now.
          +
     *

[294]My Opinion. ([295]Score:1)
       by [296]Motleypuss [297]( 10291831 ) writes:
       The TSA has no purpose, and this won't help.
          +
     *

[298]Complaining about what? ([299]Score:2)
       by [300]ThumpBzztZoom [301]( 6976422 ) writes:
       I don't like to yell, but this is needed due to the volume of
       people who have no clue what they are talking about, but are
       actively complaining anyway. It's like they thought Minority Report
       was a film about current events and are reacting to the headline.
       THIS ISN'T REAL-TIME, "WALKING BY A VIDEO CAMERA AND IDENTIFYING
       FROM VAST DATABASE" FACIAL RECOGNITION. THIS IS "LINE UP YOUR HEAD
       TO THE OUTLINE AND TAKE A PHOTO SO WE CAN COMPARE IT TO YOUR ID
       PHOTO" FACIAL RECOGNITION.
       The video facial recognition has s
          +
          +

[302]Re: Complaining about what? ([303]Score:2)
            by [304]CrappySnackPlane [305]( 7852536 ) writes:
            Why is this the photo you object to, and not the others? Your
            information and your photo were already in the database long
            before you got to the airport.
            What planet have you been living on where people haven't also
            objected to the others?
            One more photo is one more opportunity for a potentially
            life-ruining false positive. Just because the lake's already
            polluted doesn't mean it's fine to be dumping more filth in.
               o
     *

[306]Failure. ([307]Score:1)
       by [308]Motleypuss [309]( 10291831 ) writes:
       The TSA has never succeeded at anything, last I checked. This is
       just another way to fail.
          +
     * [310]2 replies beneath your current threshold.
     *

   There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript
   enabled, you might want to [311]turn on Classic Discussion System in
   your preferences instead.

[312]Related Links Top of the: [313]day, [314]week, [315]month.

     * 497 comments[316]Truck Thief Gunned Down by Owner After AirTag
       Gives Away Location
     * 453 comments[317]Symbolic Wyoming Proposal Urges Voluntary
       Phase-out of EV Purchases by 2035
     * 391 comments[318]Texts and Web Searches Have Been Used to Prosecute
       Women for Abortions
     * 377 comments[319]What Happened After Matt Taibbi Revealed Twitter's
       Deliberations on Hunter Biden Tweets?
     * 359 comments[320]The Three Reasons Why Elon Musk Called Off His
       Acquisition of Twitter

[321]next

   The Almighty Buck

   [322]Dell In Hot Water For Making Shoppers Think Overpriced Monitors
   Were Discounted
   52 comments

[323]previous

   Communications

   [324]Satellite Beams Solar Power Down To Earth, In First-of-a-Kind
   Demonstration
   63 comments

Slashdot Top Deals

   [325]Slashdot

   [326]Post Moderate Moderator Help Delete
     * [327]Get more comments
     * 55 of 55 loaded

     * [328]Submit Story

     The meat is rotten, but the booze is holding out. Computer
     translation of "The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak."

     * [329]FAQ
     * [330]Story Archive
     * [331]Hall of Fame
     * [332]Advertising
     * [333]Terms
     * [334]Privacy Statement
     * [335]About
     * [336]Feedback
     * [337]Mobile View
     * [338]Blog
     *
     * (BUTTON) Icon Do Not Sell My Personal Information

   Trademarks property of their respective owners. Comments owned by the
   poster. Copyright © 2023 SlashdotMedia. All Rights Reserved.

   ×

   [339]Close

   [340]Close

   [341]Slashdot

   [njs.gif?519]

   Working...

References

   Visible links
   1. https://m.slashdot.org/story/415268
   2. https://slashdot.org/
   3. https://yro.slashdot.org/search.pl
   4. https://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotYourRightsOnline
   5. https://slashdot.org/
   6. https://slashdot.org/
   7. https://slashdot.org/recent
   8. https://slashdot.org/popular
   9. https://slashdot.org/polls
  10. https://slashdot.org/software/
  11. https://www.slashdotstore.com/
  12. https://slashdot.org/newsletter
  13. https://slashdot.org/jobs
  14. https://slashdot.org/submission
  15. https://slashdot.org/my/login
  16. https://slashdot.org/my/newuser
  17. https://devices.slashdot.org/
  18. https://build.slashdot.org/
  19. https://entertainment.slashdot.org/
  20. https://technology.slashdot.org/
  21. https://slashdot.org/?fhfilter=opensource
  22. https://science.slashdot.org/
  23. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  24. https://rss.slashdot.org/Slashdot/slashdotMain
  25. https://www.facebook.com/slashdot
  26. https://www.linkedin.com/company/slashdot
  27. https://twitter.com/slashdot
  28. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsW36751Gy-EAbHQwe9WBNw
  29. https://mastodon.cloud/@slashdot
  30. https://slashdot.org/newsletter
  31. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Slashdotorg/267995220856
  32. https://slashdot.org/my/mailpassword
  33. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  34. https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/GitHub Importer/
  35. https://sourceforge.net/p/import_project/github/
  36. https://slashdot.org/newsletter
  37. https://slashdot.org/jobs-2
  38. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  39. https://yro.slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=privacy
  40. https://yro.slashdot.org/index2.pl?fhfilter=usa
  41. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  42. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tsa-facial-recognition-program-airports-expands/
  43. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program#comments
  44. https://twitter.com/BeauHD
  45. https://yro.slashdot.org/~SonicSpike
  46. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tsa-facial-recognition-program-airports-expands/
  47. https://science.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0542233/satellite-beams-solar-power-down-to-earth-in-first-of-a-kind-demonstr
ation?sdsrc=prev
  48. https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/060207/dell-in-hot-water-for-making-shoppers-think-overpriced-monitors-were-
discounted?sdsrc=next
  49. https://science.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0542233/satellite-beams-solar-power-down-to-earth-in-first-of-a-kind-demonstr
ation?sdsrc=prev
  50. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/04/02/0017232/truck-thief-gunned-down-by-owner-after-airtag-gives-away-location?sdsrc=p
opbyskid
  51. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/01/15/2125229/symbolic-wyoming-proposal-urges-voluntary-phase-out-of-ev-purchases-by-20
35?sdsrc=popbyskid
  52. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/07/04/0430249/texts-and-web-searches-have-been-used-to-prosecute-women-for-abortions?sd
src=popbyskid
  53. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/12/03/1615242/what-happened-after-matt-taibbi-revealed-twitters-deliberations-on-hunter
-biden-tweets?sdsrc=popbyskid
  54. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/07/11/0458240/the-three-reasons-why-elon-musk-called-off-his-acquisition-of-twitter?sds
rc=popbyskid
  55. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  56. https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/060207/dell-in-hot-water-for-making-shoppers-think-overpriced-monitors-were-
discounted?sdsrc=next
  57. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  58. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  59. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=
  60. https://yro.slashdot.org/login.pl
  61. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  62. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=
  63. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  64. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  65. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=
  66. https://yro.slashdot.org/login.pl
  67. https://slashdot.org/my/mailpassword
  68. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  69. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  70. https://yro.slashdot.org/search.pl?op=comments&sid=22918154
  71. https://yro.slashdot.org/users.pl
  72. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  73. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  74. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  75. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  76. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  77. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582784
  78. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  79. https://slashdot.org/~quonset
  80. https://slashdot.org/~quonset
  81. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582784
  82. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=Reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582784
  83. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  84. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Republicans want to reduce spending by quonset @slashdot https://yro.slashdot.org/c
omments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582784
  85. https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582784
  86. https://plus.google.com/share?url=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582784
  87. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=flag&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582784
  88. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582826
  89. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  90. https://slashdot.org/~christoban
  91. https://slashdot.org/~christoban
  92. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582884
  93. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  94. https://slashdot.org/~Entrope
  95. https://slashdot.org/~Entrope
  96. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583444
  97. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
  98. https://slashdot.org/~groobly
  99. https://slashdot.org/~groobly
 100. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583062
 101. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 102. https://slashdot.org/~christoban
 103. https://slashdot.org/~christoban
 104. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582884
 105. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583300
 106. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 107. https://slashdot.org/~SuperKendall
 108. https://slashdot.org/~SuperKendall
 109. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582860
 110. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 111. https://slashdot.org/~gtall
 112. https://slashdot.org/~gtall
 113. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582968
 114. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 115. https://slashdot.org/~Inglix+the+Mad
 116. https://slashdot.org/~Inglix+the+Mad
 117. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583072
 118. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 119. https://slashdot.org/~christoban
 120. https://slashdot.org/~christoban
 121. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583268
 122. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 123. https://slashdot.org/~Inglix+the+Mad
 124. https://slashdot.org/~Inglix+the+Mad
 125. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583166
 126. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 127. https://slashdot.org/~DarkOx
 128. https://slashdot.org/~DarkOx
 129. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583602
 130. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 131. https://slashdot.org/~cellocgw
 132. https://slashdot.org/~cellocgw
 133. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583738
 134. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 135. https://slashdot.org/~DarkOx
 136. https://slashdot.org/~DarkOx
 137. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63583166
 138. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583202
 139. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 140. https://slashdot.org/~ArchieBunker
 141. https://slashdot.org/~ArchieBunker
 142. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583290
 143. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 144. https://slashdot.org/~JackieBrown
 145. https://slashdot.org/~JackieBrown
 146. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583218
 147. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 148. https://slashdot.org/~SomePoorSchmuck
 149. https://slashdot.org/~SomePoorSchmuck
 150. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583564
 151. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 152. https://slashdot.org/~whoever57
 153. https://slashdot.org/~whoever57
 154. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583312
 155. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 156. https://slashdot.org/~SuperKendall
 157. https://slashdot.org/~SuperKendall
 158. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583348
 159. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 160. https://slashdot.org/~0xG
 161. https://slashdot.org/~0xG
 162. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583048
 163. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 164. https://slashdot.org/~Joce640k
 165. https://slashdot.org/~Joce640k
 166. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583048
 167. http://www.topaz3d.com/
 168. https://www.google.com/search?name=f&hl=en&q=tsa+fails+penetration+test
 169. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=Reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63583048
 170. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=63582800
 171. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 172. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Re:Use facial recognition on the entire airport by Joce640k @slashdot https://yro.s
lashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583048
 173. https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583048
 174. https://plus.google.com/share?url=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583048
 175. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=flag&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63583048
 176. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583306
 177. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 178. https://slashdot.org/~JackieBrown
 179. https://slashdot.org/~JackieBrown
 180. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63583048
 181. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582806
 182. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 183. https://slashdot.org/~Required+Snark
 184. https://slashdot.org/~Required+Snark
 185. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582816
 186. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 187. https://slashdot.org/~usedtobestine
 188. https://slashdot.org/~usedtobestine
 189. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582816
 190. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/22/technology/ai-photo-labels-google-apple.html
 191. https://www.wired.com/story/when-it-comes-to-gorillas-google-photos-remains-blind/
 192. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=Reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582816
 193. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 194. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I seriously doubt it by usedtobestine @slashdot https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.p
l?sid=22918154&cid=63582816
 195. https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582816
 196. https://plus.google.com/share?url=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582816
 197. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=flag&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582816
 198. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582938
 199. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 200. https://slashdot.org/~drinkypoo
 201. https://slashdot.org/~drinkypoo
 202. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582938
 203. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583080
 204. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 205. https://slashdot.org/~christoban
 206. https://slashdot.org/~christoban
 207. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582890
 208. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 209. https://slashdot.org/~Unpopular+Opinions
 210. https://slashdot.org/~Unpopular+Opinions
 211. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582918
 212. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 213. https://slashdot.org/~dawidkaczmarczyk
 214. https://slashdot.org/~dawidkaczmarczyk
 215. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582924
 216. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 217. https://slashdot.org/~CrappySnackPlane
 218. https://slashdot.org/~CrappySnackPlane
 219. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582924
 220. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=Reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582924
 221. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 222. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Sounds great, but... by CrappySnackPlane @slashdot https://yro.slashdot.org/comment
s.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582924
 223. https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582924
 224. https://plus.google.com/share?url=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582924
 225. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=flag&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582924
 226. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583356
 227. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 228. https://slashdot.org/~NoWayNoShapeNoForm
 229. https://slashdot.org/~NoWayNoShapeNoForm
 230. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582924
 231. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582954
 232. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 233. https://slashdot.org/~Inglix+the+Mad
 234. https://slashdot.org/~Inglix+the+Mad
 235. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582954
 236. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=Reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582954
 237. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 238. https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=The TSA is not needed by Inglix the Mad @slashdot https://yro.slashdot.org/comments
.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582954
 239. https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582954
 240. https://plus.google.com/share?url=https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582954
 241. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=flag&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582954
 242. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583014
 243. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 244. https://slashdot.org/~RegistrationIsDumb83
 245. https://slashdot.org/~RegistrationIsDumb83
 246. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583052
 247. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 248. https://slashdot.org/~Joce640k
 249. https://slashdot.org/~Joce640k
 250. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583276
 251. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 252. https://slashdot.org/~Inglix+the+Mad
 253. https://slashdot.org/~Inglix+the+Mad
 254. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583496
 255. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 256. https://slashdot.org/~Bruce66423
 257. https://slashdot.org/~Bruce66423
 258. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hijackings
 259. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582988
 260. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 261. https://slashdot.org/~PJ6
 262. https://slashdot.org/~PJ6
 263. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583208
 264. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 265. https://slashdot.org/~ArchieBunker
 266. https://slashdot.org/~ArchieBunker
 267. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583314
 268. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 269. https://slashdot.org/~JackieBrown
 270. https://slashdot.org/~JackieBrown
 271. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583436
 272. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 273. https://slashdot.org/~avandesande
 274. https://slashdot.org/~avandesande
 275. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63582994
 276. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 277. https://slashdot.org/~schwit1
 278. https://slashdot.org/~schwit1
 279. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgeB9tCz9EY
 280. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583058
 281. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 282. https://slashdot.org/~Joce640k
 283. https://slashdot.org/~Joce640k
 284. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583672
 285. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 286. https://slashdot.org/~Joce640k
 287. https://slashdot.org/~Joce640k
 288. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63583058
 289. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=63582996
 290. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583192
 291. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 292. https://slashdot.org/~SomePoorSchmuck
 293. https://slashdot.org/~SomePoorSchmuck
 294. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583200
 295. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 296. https://slashdot.org/~Motleypuss
 297. https://slashdot.org/~Motleypuss
 298. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583454
 299. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 300. https://slashdot.org/~ThumpBzztZoom
 301. https://slashdot.org/~ThumpBzztZoom
 302. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583958
 303. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 304. https://slashdot.org/~CrappySnackPlane
 305. https://slashdot.org/~CrappySnackPlane
 306. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&cid=63583902
 307. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 308. https://slashdot.org/~Motleypuss
 309. https://slashdot.org/~Motleypuss
 310. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=0
 311. https://yro.slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
 312. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 313. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 314. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 315. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 316. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/04/02/0017232/truck-thief-gunned-down-by-owner-after-airtag-gives-away-location?sdsrc=p
opbyskidbtmprev
 317. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/01/15/2125229/symbolic-wyoming-proposal-urges-voluntary-phase-out-of-ev-purchases-by-20
35?sdsrc=popbyskidbtmprev
 318. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/07/04/0430249/texts-and-web-searches-have-been-used-to-prosecute-women-for-abortions?sd
src=popbyskidbtmprev
 319. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/12/03/1615242/what-happened-after-matt-taibbi-revealed-twitters-deliberations-on-hunter
-biden-tweets?sdsrc=popbyskidbtmprev
 320. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/07/11/0458240/the-three-reasons-why-elon-musk-called-off-his-acquisition-of-twitter?sds
rc=popbyskidbtmprev
 321. https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/060207/dell-in-hot-water-for-making-shoppers-think-overpriced-monitors-were-
discounted?sdsrc=nextbtmnext
 322. https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/060207/dell-in-hot-water-for-making-shoppers-think-overpriced-monitors-were-
discounted?sdsrc=nextbtmprev
 323. https://science.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0542233/satellite-beams-solar-power-down-to-earth-in-first-of-a-kind-demonstr
ation?sdsrc=prevbtmprev
 324. https://science.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0542233/satellite-beams-solar-power-down-to-earth-in-first-of-a-kind-demonstr
ation?sdsrc=prevbtmprev
 325. https://slashdot.org/
 326. https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=22918154&op=reply&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=
 327. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 328. https://yro.slashdot.org/submit
 329. https://slashdot.org/faq
 330. https://slashdot.org/archive.pl
 331. https://slashdot.org/hof.shtml
 332. https://slashdotmedia.com/advertising-and-marketing-services/
 333. https://slashdotmedia.com/terms-of-use/
 334. https://slashdotmedia.com/privacy-statement/
 335. https://slashdot.org/faq/slashmeta.shtml
 336. mailto:feedback@slashdot.org
 337. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 338. https://slashdot.org/blog
 339. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 340. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program
 341. https://slashdot.org/

   Hidden links:
 343. https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/07/0531202/tsa-expands-controversial-facial-recognition-program