In my opinion the standard Youtube web interface is:
* Non-intuitive, too much visual crap. * Too resource-hungry, both in CPU and bandwidth. * Doesn't work well on simpler (text-based) browsers such as netsurf and links.
## Features
* Doesn't use JavaScript. * Doesn't use (tracking) cookies. * CSS is optional. * Multiple interfaces available: HTTP CGI, command-line, Gopher CGI (gph), this is a work-in-progress. * Doesn't use or require the Google API. * CGI interface works nice in most browsers, including text-based ones. * On OpenBSD it runs "sandboxed" and it can be compiled as a static-linked binary with »pledge(2)«, »unveil(2)« in a chroot.
## Cons
* Order by upload date is incorrect (same as on Youtube). * Some Youtube features are not supported. * Uses scraping so might break at any point.